To launch Brea Matters for 2013, I asked a number of regular readers what they believe are the key issues facing the city during the coming year. The responses were interesting, to say the least.
The respondents include elected and appointed officials, mainstream residents on the high probability voters list and no one on city staff.
Repeatedly, the important issues lumped themselves into two categories, “Money” and “Mechanics.”
The first are issues for which there are specific, calculable fiscal concerns, and the latter centers on issues of policy, protocol and ethics impacting Council’s ability to lead with vision and govern with clarity and fairness.
Council’s obvious dysfunction over the past six years or so, amplified by the criminally unbelievable reorganization fiasco on December 18, leaves many of us with no sense of confidence in Council’s ability to do the work they were elected to do. They’re failing in the most fundamental tasks and seem to have turned a deaf ear to the public outcry for transparency and accountability.
Almost without exception, respondents believe that the fiscal issues facing Brea this next year are manageable, assuming a well functioning Council. And there’s your elephant in the room.
Here’s a rundown of the fiscal issues, in no certain order… sort of.
- Movement must be made in direction of defined contribution versus defined benefit type pensions.
- The city can no longer afford the extravagant pensions afforded city employees, in fact, we haven’t been able to afford them for many years.
- Brea needs to establish a new employee compensation policy that is not dependent on any salary surveys comparing us with other cities.
- Current study shows that all OC cities pay at a similar high level (about 30% greater than the private sector).
- Further adjustment to salary and benefit plans for public safety also deserve immediate attention.
- The upcoming review of the City Manager’s contract, in light of recent performance, deserves more than a cursory glance and rubber stamp.
- Likewise our contract with Richards, Watson & Gershon.
- There needs to be a comprehensive recognition and addressing of Brea’s unfunded liabilities in general.
- Roy Moore requested a review several months ago but was rebuffed by Schweitzer, Murdock and O’Donnell. He is pursuing his own independent review. We need to support him in this endeavor.
- We must recover from our past reliance on the Redevelopment Agency to direct growth of the city.
- A clear explanation of the role of the “Successor Agency” is overdue. The Successor Agency needs to meet when the public is better able to attend and participate.
- What funds has the state taken? What funds are left? What projects were stranded without funding?
- What projects do not have the capacity to generate the tax increment necessary to retire their debt?
- What debts remain and what is the extent of our liability?
- Where is the old Redevelopment Agency staff and who’s paying their salaries?
- Assessing the Fire Department’s progress following the O’Donnell forced reorganization seems to have stopped, at least no reporting has been made public in some time. Have we saved any money or not?
- The Police Department, following the woefully unexpected loss of the contract with Yorba Linda, is trying to establish a new “Brea Only” organization plan. What is it? How does it work? What will it cost and how will we afford it?
- Maintaining a balanced budget without tapping reserves or redirecting funds without full disclosure and public consent.
- City services and the cost to provide them, all of them, need to be adjusted in the face of a continued slow economic recovery.
- Dramatic reduction the all travel allotments for Council and Staff.
- Elimination of the City Manager’s privilege of discretionary spending (without Council review and approval).
- Allegations were made that Brea is over charging businesses for fire and business permits, this should be reviewed.
- We must continue discussions with our neighbors regarding “regionalization” of services (expansion beyond Fire Department Command Staff, Police Department and Command Staff, Public Safety Dispatch Services, Maintenance Services, and Service Delivery).
- Brea is in line to receive in excess of $30 million by the time the closure is complete and how those dollars are spent must have community input.
- Redirecting of these funds, thanks to nebulous contract language, to replace monies lost in the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency or any other declining or needy revenue source ought not be allowed.
Well, that’s a summary of the “fiscal issue” responses I received. Most respondents asked for anonymity, I’ve decided to give it to them all. I’m confident they would agree that what they’ve said is far more important than who said it.
As my Gramma used to say, “Eat it up. Wear it out. Make it do, or do without.” It’s how us common folks learned to live within our means. They could do well to learn that lesson down at city hall.
Next post will summarize the “Mechanics” issues. Stay tuned. Undoubtedly feathers will get ruffled.